Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:37
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Starliner future plans still in limbo - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Similarity in long‑term romantic couples probably matters less than we think - PsyPost
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
NBA Draft will have tons of international talent, which is to be expected - NBA
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Michael Altenhofen Is NASA Deputy Chief of Staff - NASA Watch
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
When should I use the best sunscreen for oily skin?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Should India conduct another air strike to attack Pakistan over the Pahalgam attack?